Re: Re: Validation class comments

On Tue, 23 Apr 2002 16:46:09 -0300 Manuel Lemos <mlemos@acm.org> wrote: > Not in my experience of more that 3 years with that class that I use. cool :). >It came to a point that it hardly needs any maintenance because it > provides all the basic services that I need. The class has now almost > 13.000 users and it has been time since anybody made a feature > request. So, I think it is pretty much done. Certainly, but did you have many contributors ? or do you work alone on this class ? I try it and yes it works, but damned, I prefer re write 10 others classes rather than trying to find something in it. Maintenance is a must. And when I read a "too much modular" lib in pear and see a clean source and short methods, what should I say ? thank's guys. In a pure estetic way or conceptual way, it s impossible to work with your classe. > The main types of validation are too trivial to compensate the > overhead of putting them in separate classes. Anyway this is a test, checking out if we can get something nice and usefull. Maybe can you help us to create a usefull data validation module ? ( understood not only forms validation or trivial regexp) ? pa