Re: pear(1): Could not open input file.

> From: "Tomas V.V.Cox" <cox@idecnet.com> > To: Roman Neuhauser <neuhauser@bellavista.cz> > Cc: PEAR DEV <pear-dev@lists.php.net> > Date: 25 Jun 2002 21:20:54 +0200 > Subject: Re: [PEAR-DEV] pear(1): Could not open input file. > > El mar, 25-06-2002 a las 20:36, Roman Neuhauser escribió: > > > From: "Tomas V.V.Cox" <cox@idecnet.com> > > > To: Roman Neuhauser <neuhauser@bellavista.cz> > > > Cc: PEAR DEV <pear-dev@lists.php.net> > > > Date: 25 Jun 2002 18:53:09 +0200 > > > Subject: Re: [PEAR-DEV] pear(1): Could not open input file. > > > > > > El mar, 25-06-2002 a las 17:06, Roman Neuhauser escribió: > > > > > Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2002 16:47:49 +0200 > > > > > From: "Tomas V.V.Cox" <cox@idecnet.com> > > > > > To: Roman Neuhauser <neuhauser@bellavista.cz> > > > > > CC: pear-dev <pear-dev@lists.php.net> > > > > > Subject: Re: [PEAR-DEV] pear(1): Could not open input file. > > > > > > > > > > > revert your commit, it doesn't help anything. > > > > > > > > > > Your patch is wrong, removing the -Cq will break compat with php-cgi. > > > > > Why it doesn't help? > > > > > > > > regardless of whether my patch is right or wrong, please do revert > > > > the change you made. it doesn't help anything, makes the script > > > > different from other pear scripts which use -d to set include_path, > > > > and thus increases the WTF factor. > > (mark 1) ---------------------------^ > > > > > > > Please explain me the functional difference between (apart from the "WTF > > > factor" that you don't need to care): > > > > > > #!/usr/bin/php -Cqd include_path=foo > > > <?php > > > > > > ?> > > > > > > and > > > > > > #!/usr/bin/php -Cq > > > <?php > > > ini_set('include_path', 'foo'); > > > ?> > > > > please explain to me where I said that there was any functional > > difference. > > See (mark 1). that doesn't say there is any functional difference. it says that it increases the WTF factor. -- FreeBSD 4.6-STABLE 9:20AM up 2 days, 6:20, 8 users, load averages: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00