Re: Re: Examples at pear documentation

--- Dennis Sterzenbach <lists@darknoise.de> wrote: > Hodicska Gergely wrote: > > I have a little probrlem with documentation's > examples. > > The source of these examples contains at the > lineends "<br />". > > This cause if I copy-paste the code to an editor, > the whole code will apear > > in one line. > > The separator should be "<br />\n". > Well if I do so, I get it all right. > Maybe this could be a problem of your browser or the > editor, too? > > But there's something else, I noticed in the source > code of the > manual's pages: the HTML tags (and entities) are > very much > broke up into several lines. > Example: > <tt > CLASS="parameter" > ><i > >'=='</i > ></tt > > like the colon in short options. > > should IMO be: > <tt CLASS="parameter"><i>'=='</i></tt> like the > colon in short options. Those tags are valid ones, generated using the stylesheets applied to the original DocBook XML source. They do not need to look nice, they just need to be valid (and they are AFAIK). If you would like them to look nice, you could modify the XSL or DSSSL stylesheets and send the patches to us (or even better to the DocBook developers so others can also benefit). > No browser I use does complain about it -otherwise > I'd noticed before-, > but I don't know if this really is conform to the > W3C standard(s). A quick visit to the W3C web site would've dispelled your doubts: http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-xml#dt-stag XHTML are XML conforming documents (as per http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/#xhtml) ===== --- Jesus M. Castagnetto <jmcastagnetto@php.net> __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Exclusive Video Premiere - Britney Spears http://launch.yahoo.com/promos/britneyspears/