Re: Re: XML_Serializer - Style of empty tag

From: Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2004 13:30:46 +0000
Subject: Re: Re: XML_Serializer - Style of empty tag
References: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8  Groups: php.pear.general 
Request: Send a blank email to pear-general+get-15944@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
Ignatius Reilly wrote:
by "non-standard" I meant non-W3C standard compliant (XML 1.0), not non-PHP or non-PEAR compliant (whatever that would mean) It's what I mean too.
XML processors are out of pear's control. So just an option from XML_Serializer more (not breaking BC for those not giving it) is not so a big stuff. (hmm! I'm not he worker there) BTW & poor related, I would allways like to open a new basic class with some parameter/property $_options: open associative array for (future) options
<>From: http://www.w3c.org/TR/2004/REC-xml-20040204/#sec-starttags Empty-element tags MAY be used for any element which has no content, whether or not it is declared using the keyword EMPTY. For interoperability, the empty-element tag SHOULD be used, and SHOULD only be used, for elements which are declared EMPTY.
-- bertrand Gugger (toggg)

« previous php.pear.general (#15944) next »