Re: Which pear templating system is most popular?
| From: | David Ball | Date: | Fri, 16 Feb 2007 02:54:42 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Which pear templating system is most popular? | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 | Groups: | php.pear.general |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-general+get-26593@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
And I third it. I just started a medium sized web application and even though I have not done much web work in the past I still found Smarty very easy to setup and use.
David
Marty Buchaus wrote:
I second this opinion I've used smarty in single page sites and very large applications. Marty On Feb 15, 2007, at 2:44 AM, Subscriptions wrote:You should still consider Smarty. Smarty is very powerful, but can be used for very small sites as well. It is very easy to learn and allows you to grow in the future. Tony www.marionweb.com Lukas Ruetz wrote:- -- William Marty Buchaus Jr - -- RHCE (RedHat Certified Engineer) - Cert # 807101943103186 ICQ: 10579998 AIM: snuffychiHi! Am Mittwoch, 14. Februar 2007 22:56 schrieb l Burnerheimerton:--PEAR General Mailing List (http://pear.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.phpI need to start using a template system/package for my projects but don't need a super-dooper powerful one like Smarty. Any suggestions? Many thanks!We use Flexy here. It compiles its templates for performance, supports i18n and the pages can be handled in an OO-way. If you don't need all the features Flexy provides an older and slower but simple template-system is IT(X). lukas