Re: About release XML_HTMLSax-3.0.0 (stable)

Well, personally I'm a bit puzzled. Maybe we should say this was really the last time we let things like this slip through? I don't want to stand here as the big show-stopper (sorry Harry), but to me it sounds like some things went wrong. I see that there were only quite minor changes in general. However, no longer extending from PEAR might be an issue for some people. And the package has been stable before, so it might already been widely in use. Since there is no PEAR-QA-team yet, let's wait if one of the people currently in charge thinks it's worth pulling the release. @Harry: Current rules state that a new major should become it's own package, so to be able for all future major releases to coexist and not break apps relying on one or the other. Regards, Stefan On 28 May 2004 at 23:52, Cipriano Groenendal wrote: > 30 downloads of it as we speak... > I'd say early enough to pull it, if deemed necessary. > > Naming convention, plus the no RC release should be enough of a violation to > justify this. We could always return it afterwards, if everything's checked > out OK :) > > Just my €.2 :) > > Cipri > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Stefan Neufeind" <stefan@neufeind.net> > To: <pear-qa@lists.php.net> > Cc: "Harry Fuecks" <hfuecks@phppatterns.com> > Sent: Friday, 28 May, 2004 23:39 > Subject: [PEAR-QA] About release XML_HTMLSax-3.0.0 (stable) > > > > Hi folks, > > > > I don't know if it's just me - but was the XML_HTMLSax-3.0.0 (stable)- > > release a good idea? > > > > Imho: > > - there should be no stable release without at least one RC or other > > beta > > - It should have been XML_HTMLSax3, version 3.0.0 > > > > Or were there any special reasons for this step I didn't consider? > > > > Don't get me wrong ... but imho this was no good idea. > > > > > > Regards, > > Stefan > > > > -- > > PEAR QA Mailing List (http://pear.php.net/) > > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php