Re: About release XML_HTMLSax-3.0.0 (stable)

On 28 May 2004 at 17:38, Harry Fuecks wrote: > OK - no problem - not taken personally. In fact highly impressed by the > new quality control process! > > Won't be able to sort things out until Tuesday but just to double check, I > need to; > > 1. Name the package as XML_HTMLSax3 And the class inside it :-)) > 2. Release it as release candidate (any guidelines for time periods, > number of release candidates I need to know aobut?) One is fine. According to the rules there should be at least one beta- release before a stable. No timeframe given. Just do what suites best - we trust you :-)) There shouldn't be a discussion about whether the code is already good enough to be called stable from a first release or not. These are the rules ... and we arranged them this way for some reason. > 3. Close the bug reports Catch some sleep :-)) Oh, and you might want to make sure using phpDocumentor that the API- docs from inline-phpdoc-comments build fine - because APIdoc is automatically generated for each release nowadays, thanks to Martin. Regards, Stefan > > Davey wrote: > > > >> +1 from my end too. > >> > >> I totally agree with David on this one. > >> > >> - Davey > >> > >> David Costa wrote: > >> > >>> > >>> On May 29, 2004, at 12:16 AM, Stefan Neufeind wrote: > >>> > >>>>> > >>> snipp > >>> > >>>>> > >>>>> We now have 68 downloads. I would like to pull the release but I also > >>>>> dont want to make the decision on my own. Cipri seems to favor > >>>>> pulling > >>>>> the release as well. Stefan is a little less sure. > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> +1 from my side, David the same. So this is 4 people. And I'm sure > >>>> Harry won't take it as personal offense. So imho let's go for it. > > > > I just pulled the release. > > > > pearweb is playing dead so I cant finish up my mail to pear-general@ and > > pear-dev@ because I want to mention the links to the regulations in my > > mail. > > > > *sigh*