Re: Is XML_RPC2 Maintained?

Alan Langford wrote: > This package has been Alpha since March; there are some minor open bugs, > including some patches (some of them not so good); and some fairly > serious ones. In particular there is "XML_RPC2 CVS directory structure > doesn't respect the PEAR standard", which seems to have been submitted > by one of the listed maintainers -- late last year. > > I have been working on extending the package to support additional > backends and I have discovered that the current version doesn't pass its > own QA tests. > > There are also some TODO's that are awaiting improved stability from > simplexml, and my guess is that in the last seven months some of these > issues have been addressed. Fixing these issues will improve performance. > > I can submit a patch to fix the minor issues, but I'm not sure if anyone > will be listening. My planned extensions are more extensive and although > they don't break BC, I'm sure anyone responsible for the package will > have something to say about them. > > I'm willing to adopt this package if nobody is maintaining it. I have a > PEAR account but I don't think it's got CVS karma. Let's see what Sergio says. With no answer in the next week I'll name you lead and request karma. Arnaud.