Re: Is XML_RPC2 Maintained?
| From: | Sérgio Carvalho | Date: | Sat, 21 Oct 2006 19:33:21 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Is XML_RPC2 Maintained? | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.pear.qa |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-qa+get-3992@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Maintained, yes, although most of the recent work has been done by
Fabien Marty. Do we need more help. Of course! Mostly, testing and
creating automatic tests against more XML-RPC implementations on more
platforms.
As for the move to beta status, I'd prefer to do that only after
HTTP_Request creates a PHP5 version, so we'd get rid of the HTTP_Request
stub inside XML_RPC2. I'm unclear wether such switch would require a
change in the API.
Please email me if you wish to be added as a developer.
Kind regards,
--
Sérgio Carvalho
On Wed, 2006-10-18 at 23:53 -0400, Alan Langford wrote:
> This package has been Alpha since March; there are some minor open bugs,
> including some patches (some of them not so good); and some fairly
> serious ones. In particular there is "XML_RPC2 CVS directory structure
> doesn't respect the PEAR standard", which seems to have been submitted
> by one of the listed maintainers -- late last year.
>
> I have been working on extending the package to support additional
> backends and I have discovered that the current version doesn't pass its
> own QA tests.
>
> There are also some TODO's that are awaiting improved stability from
> simplexml, and my guess is that in the last seven months some of these
> issues have been addressed. Fixing these issues will improve performance.
>
> I can submit a patch to fix the minor issues, but I'm not sure if anyone
> will be listening. My planned extensions are more extensive and although
> they don't break BC, I'm sure anyone responsible for the package will
> have something to say about them.
>
> I'm willing to adopt this package if nobody is maintaining it. I have a
> PEAR account but I don't think it's got CVS karma.