Re: Is XML_RPC2 Maintained?

From: Date: Sat, 21 Oct 2006 19:33:21 +0000
Subject: Re: Is XML_RPC2 Maintained?
References: 1  Groups: php.pear.qa 
Request: Send a blank email to pear-qa+get-3992@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
Maintained, yes, although most of the recent work has been done by Fabien Marty. Do we need more help. Of course! Mostly, testing and creating automatic tests against more XML-RPC implementations on more platforms. As for the move to beta status, I'd prefer to do that only after HTTP_Request creates a PHP5 version, so we'd get rid of the HTTP_Request stub inside XML_RPC2. I'm unclear wether such switch would require a change in the API. Please email me if you wish to be added as a developer. Kind regards, -- Sérgio Carvalho On Wed, 2006-10-18 at 23:53 -0400, Alan Langford wrote: > This package has been Alpha since March; there are some minor open bugs, > including some patches (some of them not so good); and some fairly > serious ones. In particular there is "XML_RPC2 CVS directory structure > doesn't respect the PEAR standard", which seems to have been submitted > by one of the listed maintainers -- late last year. > > I have been working on extending the package to support additional > backends and I have discovered that the current version doesn't pass its > own QA tests. > > There are also some TODO's that are awaiting improved stability from > simplexml, and my guess is that in the last seven months some of these > issues have been addressed. Fixing these issues will improve performance. > > I can submit a patch to fix the minor issues, but I'm not sure if anyone > will be listening. My planned extensions are more extensive and although > they don't break BC, I'm sure anyone responsible for the package will > have something to say about them. > > I'm willing to adopt this package if nobody is maintaining it. I have a > PEAR account but I don't think it's got CVS karma.

« previous php.pear.qa (#3992) next »