Re: Is XML_RPC2 Maintained?

Mm, I didn't see any mail, did I miss that ? If so, sorry ! I put you back to developer then. Arnaud. Alan Langford wrote:

Woah... Sergio is still active, it's his baby! In fact I'm the one who's behind, I owe him a patch but real life has been interfering heavily with my plans (darn those pesky customers). I really don't want to tick him off, so developer status is probably more appropriate. On 2006 11 21 14:10, Arnaud Limbourg wrote:

Hi alan, A bit late but I just made you lead of RPC2. You can write to pear-group to request karma. Sorry for the delay, Arnaud. Arnaud Limbourg wrote:

Alan Langford wrote:

This package has been Alpha since March; there are some minor open bugs, including some patches (some of them not so good); and some fairly serious ones. In particular there is "XML_RPC2 CVS directory structure doesn't respect the PEAR standard", which seems to have been submitted by one of the listed maintainers -- late last year. I have been working on extending the package to support additional backends and I have discovered that the current version doesn't pass its own QA tests. There are also some TODO's that are awaiting improved stability from simplexml, and my guess is that in the last seven months some of these issues have been addressed. Fixing these issues will improve performance. I can submit a patch to fix the minor issues, but I'm not sure if anyone will be listening. My planned extensions are more extensive and although they don't break BC, I'm sure anyone responsible for the package will have something to say about them. I'm willing to adopt this package if nobody is maintaining it. I have a PEAR account but I don't think it's got CVS karma.

Let's see what Sergio says. With no answer in the next week I'll name you lead and request karma. Arnaud.