Re: Is XML_RPC2 Maintained?

Hi, Because of the dead of a project I worked on... ...today, I don't use XMLRPC anymore So I'm not a really a good "lead" for this package :-( So Sergio, thanks to downgrade my karma to a simple developper (for this package). IMHO, XML_RPC2 is a good alpha package. It's not a bad draft. There are plenty of unit tests, some peardocs and the code is ok. There is no need to launch a XML_RPC3. XML_RPC2 need only a little love to be able to get out from the alpha state. Regards Fabien 2006/10/19, Alan Langford <jal@ambitonline.com>:

This package has been Alpha since March; there are some minor open bugs, including some patches (some of them not so good); and some fairly serious ones. In particular there is "XML_RPC2 CVS directory structure doesn't respect the PEAR standard", which seems to have been submitted by one of the listed maintainers -- late last year. I have been working on extending the package to support additional backends and I have discovered that the current version doesn't pass its own QA tests. There are also some TODO's that are awaiting improved stability from simplexml, and my guess is that in the last seven months some of these issues have been addressed. Fixing these issues will improve performance. I can submit a patch to fix the minor issues, but I'm not sure if anyone will be listening. My planned extensions are more extensive and although they don't break BC, I'm sure anyone responsible for the package will have something to say about them. I'm willing to adopt this package if nobody is maintaining it. I have a PEAR account but I don't think it's got CVS karma. -- PEAR QA Mailing List (http://pear.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

-- Fabien MARTY fabien.marty@gmail.com