Re: [Net_SMPP] Taking over unmaintained package

From: Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2010 09:24:33 +0000
Subject: Re: [Net_SMPP] Taking over unmaintained package
References: 1 2 3  Groups: php.pear.qa 
Request: Send a blank email to pear-qa+get-5641@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 11:17 AM, Simon Spencer <silospen@silospen.com>wrote: > > > On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 2:44 AM, Daniel O'Connor <daniel.oconnor@gmail.com > > wrote: > >> >> >> On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 5:23 PM, Simon Spencer <silospen@silospen.com>wrote: >> >>> Hello, >>> >>> I'd like to express my interest in taking over the NET_SMPP package. I'm >>> currently implementing an ESME to send SMPP packages and I've found a bug >>> or >>> two and I would like to add a few features. One of the features I'm >>> adding >>> is currently listed as a feature request on the site from '06. I'd also >>> like >>> to add some more examples to show developers how they should use this >>> library as it's not really documented! >>> >> >> Sounds good! Re the bugs, can you add bug reports and patches? >> Ditto http://pear.php.net/bugs/bug.php?id=9492 ? >> >> >> > I've added/patched the bug I found: > http://pear.php.net/bugs/bug.php?id=17308 and added a patch to: > http://pear.php.net/bugs/bug.php?id=9492 > > Well, I thought I could conform to PEAR standards, but I failed to even in that little snippet. http://pear.php.net/bugs/bug.php?id=17308 should now be correct!

« previous php.pear.qa (#5641) next »