Re: [Net_SMPP] Taking over unmaintained package
| From: | Simon Spencer | Date: | Mon, 12 Apr 2010 09:24:33 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: [Net_SMPP] Taking over unmaintained package | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 | Groups: | php.pear.qa |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-qa+get-5641@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 11:17 AM, Simon Spencer <silospen@silospen.com>wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 2:44 AM, Daniel O'Connor <daniel.oconnor@gmail.com
> > wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 5:23 PM, Simon Spencer <silospen@silospen.com>wrote:
>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I'd like to express my interest in taking over the NET_SMPP package. I'm
>>> currently implementing an ESME to send SMPP packages and I've found a bug
>>> or
>>> two and I would like to add a few features. One of the features I'm
>>> adding
>>> is currently listed as a feature request on the site from '06. I'd also
>>> like
>>> to add some more examples to show developers how they should use this
>>> library as it's not really documented!
>>>
>>
>> Sounds good! Re the bugs, can you add bug reports and patches?
>> Ditto http://pear.php.net/bugs/bug.php?id=9492 ?
>>
>>
>>
> I've added/patched the bug I found:
> http://pear.php.net/bugs/bug.php?id=17308 and added a patch to:
> http://pear.php.net/bugs/bug.php?id=9492
>
> Well, I thought I could conform to PEAR standards, but I failed to even in
that little snippet. http://pear.php.net/bugs/bug.php?id=17308
should now be
correct!