Re: [Net_SMPP] Taking over unmaintained package

From: Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2010 11:46:22 +0000
Subject: Re: [Net_SMPP] Taking over unmaintained package
References: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7  Groups: php.pear.qa 
Request: Send a blank email to pear-qa+get-5648@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
Thanks a lot for the list of tasks, they're very useful as I'm still trying to read and understand all the PEAR guidelines/rules. Hopefully, there'll be a new release soonish! See you on IRC. On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 12:30 PM, Daniel O'Connor <daniel.oconnor@gmail.com>wrote: > Karma added. > > Some housekeeping tasks for you when the SVN account comes through: > 1) Upgrade to package 2.0 (pear convert && cp package2.xml package.xml) > 2) Fix the internal directory structure (svn mkdir Net && svn mv SMPP Net > && svn mv SMPP.php Net); and regenerate the package.xml (I suggest > pear_packagefilemanager_cli - then it's just 'pfm' and answering a few > questions) > 3) Apply your patches > 4) Some basic unit test coverage wouldn't hurt :) (PHPUnit ftw) > 5) Prepare your new release :) > > We're on #pear / irc.efnet.org if you have questions, or of course the > pear-dev mailing list. > > > > On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 7:46 PM, Simon Spencer <silospen@silospen.com>wrote: > >> Great! I applied for an SVN account with, as you guessed, the user account >> 'silospen'. >> >> >> On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 11:36 AM, Daniel O'Connor < >> daniel.oconnor@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Looks good to me at a glance. >>> >>> Next step: get yourself an svn account and for me to set you up with the >>> appropriate karma. >>> http://php.net/svn.php >>> >>> Forwarding this email or otherwise including a link to it (ie: mail >>> archive) doesn't hurt. >>> >>> I take it silospen is the user account you'll apply for? >>> >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 6:54 PM, Simon Spencer <silospen@silospen.com>wrote: >>> >>>> On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 11:17 AM, Simon Spencer <silospen@silospen.com >>>> >wrote: >>>> >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 2:44 AM, Daniel O'Connor < >>>> daniel.oconnor@gmail.com >>>> > > wrote: >>>> > >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 5:23 PM, Simon Spencer < >>>> silospen@silospen.com>wrote: >>>> >> >>>> >>> Hello, >>>> >>> >>>> >>> I'd like to express my interest in taking over the NET_SMPP >>>> >>> package. >>>> I'm >>>> >>> currently implementing an ESME to send SMPP packages and I've >>>> >>> found >>>> a bug >>>> >>> or >>>> >>> two and I would like to add a few features. One of the features >>>> >>> I'm >>>> >>> adding >>>> >>> is currently listed as a feature request on the site from '06. >>>> >>> I'd >>>> also >>>> >>> like >>>> >>> to add some more examples to show developers how they should use >>>> this >>>> >>> library as it's not really documented! >>>> >>> >>>> >> >>>> >> Sounds good! Re the bugs, can you add bug reports and patches? >>>> >> Ditto >>>> >> http://pear.php.net/bugs/bug.php?id=9492 ? >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> > I've added/patched the bug I found: >>>> > http://pear.php.net/bugs/bug.php?id=17308 and >>>> > added a patch to: >>>> > http://pear.php.net/bugs/bug.php?id=9492 >>>> > >>>> > Well, I thought I could conform to PEAR standards, but I failed to >>>> even in >>>> that little snippet. >>>> http://pear.php.net/bugs/bug.php?id=17308 should >>>> now be >>>> correct! >>>> >>> >>> >> >

« previous php.pear.qa (#5648) next »