Re: [Net_SMPP] Taking over unmaintained package
| From: | Simon Spencer | Date: | Mon, 12 Apr 2010 11:46:22 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: [Net_SMPP] Taking over unmaintained package | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 | Groups: | php.pear.qa |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-qa+get-5648@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Thanks a lot for the list of tasks, they're very useful as I'm still trying
to read and understand all the PEAR guidelines/rules.
Hopefully, there'll be a new release soonish! See you on IRC.
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 12:30 PM, Daniel O'Connor
<daniel.oconnor@gmail.com>wrote:
> Karma added.
>
> Some housekeeping tasks for you when the SVN account comes through:
> 1) Upgrade to package 2.0 (pear convert && cp package2.xml package.xml)
> 2) Fix the internal directory structure (svn mkdir Net && svn mv SMPP Net
> && svn mv SMPP.php Net); and regenerate the package.xml (I suggest
> pear_packagefilemanager_cli - then it's just 'pfm' and answering a few
> questions)
> 3) Apply your patches
> 4) Some basic unit test coverage wouldn't hurt :) (PHPUnit ftw)
> 5) Prepare your new release :)
>
> We're on #pear / irc.efnet.org if you have questions, or of course the
> pear-dev mailing list.
>
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 7:46 PM, Simon Spencer <silospen@silospen.com>wrote:
>
>> Great! I applied for an SVN account with, as you guessed, the user account
>> 'silospen'.
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 11:36 AM, Daniel O'Connor <
>> daniel.oconnor@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Looks good to me at a glance.
>>>
>>> Next step: get yourself an svn account and for me to set you up with the
>>> appropriate karma.
>>> http://php.net/svn.php
>>>
>>> Forwarding this email or otherwise including a link to it (ie: mail
>>> archive) doesn't hurt.
>>>
>>> I take it silospen is the user account you'll apply for?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 6:54 PM, Simon Spencer <silospen@silospen.com>wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 11:17 AM, Simon Spencer <silospen@silospen.com
>>>> >wrote:
>>>>
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 2:44 AM, Daniel O'Connor <
>>>> daniel.oconnor@gmail.com
>>>> > > wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> >>
>>>> >>
>>>> >> On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 5:23 PM, Simon Spencer <
>>>> silospen@silospen.com>wrote:
>>>> >>
>>>> >>> Hello,
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> I'd like to express my interest in taking over the NET_SMPP
>>>> >>> package.
>>>> I'm
>>>> >>> currently implementing an ESME to send SMPP packages and I've
>>>> >>> found
>>>> a bug
>>>> >>> or
>>>> >>> two and I would like to add a few features. One of the features
>>>> >>> I'm
>>>> >>> adding
>>>> >>> is currently listed as a feature request on the site from '06.
>>>> >>> I'd
>>>> also
>>>> >>> like
>>>> >>> to add some more examples to show developers how they should use
>>>> this
>>>> >>> library as it's not really documented!
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>
>>>> >> Sounds good! Re the bugs, can you add bug reports and patches?
>>>> >> Ditto
>>>> >> http://pear.php.net/bugs/bug.php?id=9492 ?
>>>> >>
>>>> >>
>>>> >>
>>>> > I've added/patched the bug I found:
>>>> > http://pear.php.net/bugs/bug.php?id=17308 and
>>>> > added a patch to:
>>>> > http://pear.php.net/bugs/bug.php?id=9492
>>>> >
>>>> > Well, I thought I could conform to PEAR standards, but I failed to
>>>> even in
>>>> that little snippet.
>>>> http://pear.php.net/bugs/bug.php?id=17308 should
>>>> now be
>>>> correct!
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>