Re: [Net_SMPP] Taking over unmaintained package

From: Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2010 10:16:39 +0000
Subject: Re: [Net_SMPP] Taking over unmaintained package
References: 1 2 3 4 5  Groups: php.pear.qa 
Request: Send a blank email to pear-qa+get-5645@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
Great! I applied for an SVN account with, as you guessed, the user account 'silospen'. On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 11:36 AM, Daniel O'Connor <daniel.oconnor@gmail.com>wrote: > Looks good to me at a glance. > > Next step: get yourself an svn account and for me to set you up with the > appropriate karma. > http://php.net/svn.php > > Forwarding this email or otherwise including a link to it (ie: mail > archive) doesn't hurt. > > I take it silospen is the user account you'll apply for? > > > > On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 6:54 PM, Simon Spencer <silospen@silospen.com>wrote: > >> On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 11:17 AM, Simon Spencer <silospen@silospen.com >> >wrote: >> >> > >> > >> > On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 2:44 AM, Daniel O'Connor < >> daniel.oconnor@gmail.com >> > > wrote: >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 5:23 PM, Simon Spencer <silospen@silospen.com >> >wrote: >> >> >> >>> Hello, >> >>> >> >>> I'd like to express my interest in taking over the NET_SMPP package. >> I'm >> >>> currently implementing an ESME to send SMPP packages and I've found a >> bug >> >>> or >> >>> two and I would like to add a few features. One of the features I'm >> >>> adding >> >>> is currently listed as a feature request on the site from '06. I'd >> also >> >>> like >> >>> to add some more examples to show developers how they should use this >> >>> library as it's not really documented! >> >>> >> >> >> >> Sounds good! Re the bugs, can you add bug reports and patches? >> >> Ditto http://pear.php.net/bugs/bug.php?id=9492 ? >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > I've added/patched the bug I found: >> > http://pear.php.net/bugs/bug.php?id=17308 and added a >> > patch to: >> > http://pear.php.net/bugs/bug.php?id=9492 >> > >> > Well, I thought I could conform to PEAR standards, but I failed to even >> in >> that little snippet. >> http://pear.php.net/bugs/bug.php?id=17308 should now >> be >> correct! >> > >

« previous php.pear.qa (#5645) next »