Re[2]: [pear-webmaster] [PEAR-BUG] Bug #2855 [Opn]: New bug linking system converts already linked text

Hello Daniel, >> in places where do you think it's complex. DC> My gripe with the complexity has to do with unnecessary overhead, not DC> the ability to determine how it works. So, the complexity in this case is weightened in CPU overhead? Have you done some tests first to fill your words with real facts? To me the situation seems like smb. from us has made an error and can't admit it. Me - doing this patch, testing it, wasting my time. You - by throwing letter with your personal opinion and signing it with the PEAR word. Don't you think there can be another more valuable offer, which can be trampled by your authority? To me without a third party judge this thread will never finish. I'd like to hear another opinion than your personal about is that patch worth submitting. Taking into account the time wasted, I really want to receive a fair justice from PEAR community. >> I dislike this kind of attitude and can't satisfy your request. Sorry. DC> The reason I asked is because you continually bring up topics of DC> little or no importance and explain them poorly. Then people explain DC> how that's the case. Rather than moving on, you drag the issue out DC> further. Because I want to understand what drives people to come with these solutions. If one can't find an answer in results of their work - it is a normal intention to ask. DC> Valuable members of communities such as ours make solid, important DC> points and make them succinctly. I agree, but communites are not only valuable members and they need support from the likes of you, which you personally is not able to provide. t --