Re: Re: [pear-webmaster] Re: [PEAR-QA] Thought about unmaintained package (Net_IRC in this case)
| From: | Pierre-Alain Joye | Date: | Fri, 21 Jan 2005 12:02:00 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Re: [pear-webmaster] Re: [PEAR-QA] Thought about unmaintained package (Net_IRC in this case) | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 | Groups: | php.pear.webmaster |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-webmaster+get-3776@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Fri, 21 Jan 2005 11:04:17 +0200
techtonik@php.net (Anatoly Techtonik) wrote:
> I propose to make only one "status" table, where status will
> reflect only the most important issues in package lifecycle and
> monitor that lifecycle.
A single boolean containing the deprecated status is simple and
perfect. Though we need an unmaintained flag as well, so this field
should contain one of these status:
- default (active, alive, whatever)
- unmaintained
- deprecated
A link should be displayed to easily allow one to ask for
maintenance of a given package.
QA guys, tell me if that fits your needs, could be quickly added.
--Pierre