Re: Trying to catch up
| From: | Wolfram Kriesing | Date: | Sun, 15 Oct 2000 15:15:07 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Trying to catch up | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 | Groups: | php.pear |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-pear+get-380@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
sorry i posted that message before under a wrong name...
What about the following thing i asked?
Should we not try to avoid confusion right from the beginning?
> Should not first be discussed what class-groups (like in Java - util,
> lang, system, ...) are needed
> how they are named, in which subdirectory they go and what their basic
> functionality
> should be - before the work gets done.
which also is kind of alike this question
> 1. Why not stick to a class strucutre as there are others (approved)
for
> other programming
> languages, like Java? There will be a lot of advantages, like easier
> changing from Java to PHP,
> and portability etc.
a good definition/specification is worth much more than
hundreds lines of code which might need to be changed later
a specification which is well planned makes the implementation
later a piece of cake
Wolfram