Re: Trying to catch up

From: Date: Sun, 15 Oct 2000 20:47:02 +0000
Subject: Re: Trying to catch up
References: 1 2 3 4  Groups: php.pear 
Request: Send a blank email to php-pear+get-382@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
Quoting Wolfram Kriesing <wolfram@kriesing.de>: > but is PEAR not meant to be OO? Yes, it is. This doesn't mean duplicating all of php's functions in objects. Encouraging the use of that would be encouraging unnecessarily slow, encumbered code. That's my opinion, anyway - I'm curious what other people think of it. > and wrapping the array stuff in a class does also prevent from > name-conflicts. > i could imagine that array and string functions sometimes may get the > same name > like "split" or others In my opinion, if there are naming problems, they should be solved in php, not by writing wrapper classes. -chuck -- Charles Hagenbuch, <chuck@horde.org> Many states consider gambling so immoral that they not only prohibit private gambling organizations, they thoughtfully provide their own.

« previous php.pear (#382) next »