Re: lame module
| From: | Wez Furlong | Date: | Tue, 10 Aug 2004 10:31:54 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: lame module | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.pecl.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pecl-dev+get-1103@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Whose code uses the GPL stuff; yours or lame?
If it is lame, then lame is really GPL not LGPL and thus we cannot put
an extension that links to it into PECL.
--Wez.
On Tue, 10 Aug 2004 09:55:25 +0100, gareth@fission.org.uk
<gareth@fission.org.uk> wrote:
> Ok,
>
> I've started writing a basic wrapper around libmp3lame
> (lame.sourceforge.net).
>
> Now, I'm quite eager to get this into pecl if at all possible - but the
> license is a touch on the odd side of things.
>
> Basically, it's LGPL apart from the decompression routines which use
> code from the mpg123 project - and that's all gpl.
>
> If I were to leave out the decompression routines (that is, expanding an
> mp3 to a wav for example), would this still be allowable into pecl or
> not ?