Re: Re: lame module

From: Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2004 16:08:49 +0000
Subject: Re: Re: lame module
References: 1 2 3 4 5  Groups: php.pecl.dev 
Request: Send a blank email to pecl-dev+get-1118@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
> > For what it's worth, PECL already has an OGG encoder/decoder extension: > > [shamelessplug] http://pecl.php.net/oggvorbis > > [/shamelessplug] > > I know, I've been using it quite a bit :) > Good, nice to know someone found a use for it. > It's just the mp3 encoding that I need though. > Obviously... It is the more popular/better supported format, even if the more legally restrictive one. > Ok - as for names for the module... > I was thinking of just "lame" - but part of my head is considering jokes revolving around "making php lame". > Any other suggestions gratefully recieved. > All jokes aside that's exactly what I thought when I saw your subject line "lame module" conjured images of an extension refusing to load, or exhibiting unexpected behavior, or just being pointless and insipid (more than a few of mine spring to mind)... I wouldn't recommend anything too restrictive though: "lamemp3" becomes a misnomer when you add in OGG support, lameencode" becomes inappropriate when you introduce decoding (hopefully a license-friendly decoder will come along at some point). Maybe "liblame" or "lameaudio", or hell even just "lame" is fine... The jokes will subside eventually..... -Sara

« previous php.pecl.dev (#1118) next »