Re: Re: lame module
| From: | Sara Golemon | Date: | Wed, 11 Aug 2004 16:08:49 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Re: lame module | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 | Groups: | php.pecl.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pecl-dev+get-1118@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
> > For what it's worth, PECL already has an OGG encoder/decoder extension:
> > [shamelessplug] http://pecl.php.net/oggvorbis
> > [/shamelessplug]
>
> I know, I've been using it quite a bit :)
>
Good, nice to know someone found a use for it.
> It's just the mp3 encoding that I need though.
>
Obviously... It is the more popular/better supported format, even if the
more legally restrictive one.
> Ok - as for names for the module...
> I was thinking of just "lame" - but part of my head is considering jokes
revolving around "making php lame".
> Any other suggestions gratefully recieved.
>
All jokes aside that's exactly what I thought when I saw your subject line
"lame module" conjured images of an extension refusing to load, or
exhibiting unexpected behavior, or just being pointless and insipid (more
than a few of mine spring to mind)...
I wouldn't recommend anything too restrictive though: "lamemp3" becomes a
misnomer when you add in OGG support, lameencode" becomes inappropriate when
you introduce decoding (hopefully a license-friendly decoder will come along
at some point). Maybe "liblame" or "lameaudio", or hell even just
"lame" is
fine... The jokes will subside eventually.....
-Sara