Re: lame module

From: Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2004 16:21:26 +0000
Subject: Re: lame module
References: 1  Groups: php.pecl.dev 
Request: Send a blank email to pecl-dev+get-1109@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
I've also written an extension to libmp3lame, never committed it to PECL though on account that I've been to busy to finish it. I also started a libsndfile extension to compliment it but again have been too busy. I'll show you mine if you show me yours ;) -Justin <gareth@fission.org.uk> wrote in message news:20040810085525.GB10046@snipe.visualcode.co.uk... > Ok, > > I've started writing a basic wrapper around libmp3lame > (lame.sourceforge.net). > > Now, I'm quite eager to get this into pecl if at all possible - but the > license is a touch on the odd side of things. > > Basically, it's LGPL apart from the decompression routines which use > code from the mpg123 project - and that's all gpl. > > If I were to leave out the decompression routines (that is, expanding an > mp3 to a wav for example), would this still be allowable into pecl or > not ?

« previous php.pecl.dev (#1109) next »