Re: PECL Account Request: ksadlocha

The point is that the *extension* code must not infect PECL and thus PHP with the viral LGPL/GPL license. The libs can stay LGPL provided that they are not put into PECL; the extension code itself can live there with a PHP compatible (BSDish) license. --Wez. On Mon, 11 Oct 2004 18:58:11 +0200, K.Sadlocha <ksadlocha@programics.com> wrote: > I thought LGPL is compatible. Isn't it? > Previous posts say me that there are exetensions using LGPL and BSD licensed > libraries, for example xattr (post from 2004-08-13). > > -- > ksadlocha@programics.com > > > > > > That's fine, so long as you don't put any GPL or LGPL code into PECL; > > your simplesql extension needs to have a PHP compatible license. > > > > --Wez. > > > > On Mon, 11 Oct 2004 16:01:42 +0200, K.Sadlocha <ksadlocha@programics.com> > wrote: > > > > > > 1. I changed license from GPL to LGPL. Currently SimpleSQL engine is > > > licensed under LGPL, is it OK? > > > 2. Yes, the name of the extension is simplesql, I don't know why I wrote > > > lib_simplesql. > > > > > > Uzytkownik "Wez Furlong" <kingwez@gmail.com> napisal w wiadomosci > > > news:4e89b42604101103135b99b9a4@mail.gmail.com... > > > > > > > > > > You still have not clarified the licensing for this module. > > > > Also, our convention would be to name the extension simplesql. > > > > > > > > Please confirm that the code you intend to place into PECL is licensed > > > > using a PHP compatible license. > > > > > > > > --Wez. > > -- > PECL development discussion Mailing List (http://pecl.php.net/) > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > >