Re: PECL Account Request: ksadlocha
| From: | Wez Furlong | Date: | Tue, 12 Oct 2004 15:36:33 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: PECL Account Request: ksadlocha | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 | Groups: | php.pecl.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pecl-dev+get-1450@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
(1) is fine.
--Wez.
On Tue, 12 Oct 2004 17:29:46 +0200, K.Sadlocha <ksadlocha@programics.com> wrote:
> I see two possible solutions:
> 1. I'll make a small PHP licensed extension (php_simplesql.dll) using
> (dynamically linked with) LGPL licensed engine (simplesql.dll)
> or
> 2. I'll write a special application replacing licenses in my code form LGPL
> to PHP before PECL publication
> Is any acceptable?
>
> --
> ksadlocha@programics.com
>
>
>
> > No, anything with GPL in it will infect the PHP project.
> >
> > The easiest thing you can do is keep your client libraries as LGPL,
> > and license the PHP specific part (eg: the actual extension) using the
> > PHP license.
> >
> > --Wez.
> >
> > On Mon, 11 Oct 2004 20:16:02 +0200, K.Sadlocha <ksadlocha@programics.com>
> wrote:
> > > I can add any required licenses to SimpleSQL, is dual licensed code
> > > (PHP+LGPL) acceptable?
>
> --
> PECL development discussion Mailing List (http://pecl.php.net/)
> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
>
>