Re: PECL Account Request: ksadlocha
| From: | K.Sadlocha | Date: | Tue, 12 Oct 2004 16:35:47 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: PECL Account Request: ksadlocha | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 | Groups: | php.pecl.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pecl-dev+get-1451@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
If it's okay, can I start now?
ksadlocha@programics.com
> (1) is fine.
>
> --Wez.
>
> On Tue, 12 Oct 2004 17:29:46 +0200, K.Sadlocha <ksadlocha@programics.com>
wrote:
> > I see two possible solutions:
> > 1. I'll make a small PHP licensed extension (php_simplesql.dll) using
> > (dynamically linked with) LGPL licensed engine (simplesql.dll)
> > or
> > 2. I'll write a special application replacing licenses in my code form
LGPL
> > to PHP before PECL publication
> > Is any acceptable?
> >
> > --
> > ksadlocha@programics.com
> >
> >
> >
> > > No, anything with GPL in it will infect the PHP project.
> > >
> > > The easiest thing you can do is keep your client libraries as LGPL,
> > > and license the PHP specific part (eg: the actual extension) using the
> > > PHP license.
> > >
> > > --Wez.
> > >
> > > On Mon, 11 Oct 2004 20:16:02 +0200, K.Sadlocha
<ksadlocha@programics.com>
> > wrote:
> > > > I can add any required licenses to SimpleSQL, is dual licensed code
> > > > (PHP+LGPL) acceptable?
> >
> > --
> > PECL development discussion Mailing List (http://pecl.php.net/)
> > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
> >
> >