Re: PECL Account Request: ksadlocha

From: Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2004 15:29:46 +0000
Subject: Re: PECL Account Request: ksadlocha
References: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8  Groups: php.pecl.dev 
Request: Send a blank email to pecl-dev+get-1449@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
I see two possible solutions: 1. I'll make a small PHP licensed extension (php_simplesql.dll) using (dynamically linked with) LGPL licensed engine (simplesql.dll) or 2. I'll write a special application replacing licenses in my code form LGPL to PHP before PECL publication Is any acceptable? -- ksadlocha@programics.com > No, anything with GPL in it will infect the PHP project. > > The easiest thing you can do is keep your client libraries as LGPL, > and license the PHP specific part (eg: the actual extension) using the > PHP license. > > --Wez. > > On Mon, 11 Oct 2004 20:16:02 +0200, K.Sadlocha <ksadlocha@programics.com> wrote: > > I can add any required licenses to SimpleSQL, is dual licensed code > > (PHP+LGPL) acceptable?

« previous php.pecl.dev (#1449) next »