Re: PHP|QA Member Names in phpinfo()
| From: | Zak Greant | Date: | Mon, 05 Feb 2001 18:38:35 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: PHP|QA Member Names in phpinfo() | ||
| Groups: | php.qa | ||
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-qa+get-2219@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Not to discount anyone's contribution to PHP and the QA effort - but
if you did not catch any of the messages that discussed this issue,
where were you? :)
Actually, this thread brings up a few issues that have been bugging me
lately. The biggest issue has been team participation: Is it is too
much to expect that the QA team members will read and respond to the
paltry amount of messages on the QA list?[1] I know that almost
everyone on the team is busy, but how long does it take to send a
message saying that you are busy?
Take a look at the dev and doc teams. On average, I would say that
each of these developers is as busy (or busier) as we are. How do they
manage to stay as active and committed as they do - and why can't we?
I believe that this is partially my fault - my contribution is at
times ineffective and poorly organized. If leadership in the open
source community is by example, then my example has been well-
intentioned, but otherwise poor.
I think that everyone's hope for the QA team was to have a dedicated
group of people working individually or in small teams on tackling the
problems involved in creating and maintaining an effective QA process
for PHP. Some people do this - they take on one or more aspects of QA
and devote time to it regularly. I feel that others like the idea of
being part of the QA team, but rarely respond when the call goes out
for help, feedback or testing.
I know that everyone involved in this is a volunteer and that work,
family, sanity and leisure have to come first - however, staying up to
date with the QA team can be a pretty trivial investment of time.
Even having everyone devoting a couple of hours a week would put us
ahead of where we are now. [2]
Zak Greant
[1] Note that some people participate very nicely - this invective is
not aimed at them.
[2] Even providing active feedback would be welcome. Personally, I
find it unnerving to cast my thoughts out into the ether, and not even
hear an echo in reply.
PS. Perhaps I will regret this message later, after my mailbox
explodes in a conflagration of flames or once a few hairy trolls sit
themselves on the list and will not leave.... :)