Re: Re: PHP|QA Member Names in phpinfo()

Richard Lynch wrote: > > I believe that this is partially my fault - my contribution is at > > times ineffective and poorly organized. If leadership in the open > > source community is by example, then my example has been well- > > intentioned, but otherwise poor. > > On the contrary, I think your contributions have always been effective > and well-organized! Thank you Richard! Still, I will need to be more organized to be effective. > On the rare occasions that you were "absent" you informed everybody well > in advance, and have been there pushing regularly. > > Jeez, you even remembered to resurrect that thread about re-naming > functions after the insanity of a release gave us breathing room. That's just > one perfect example of *many* where you've excelled. > > > I think that everyone's hope for the QA team was to have a dedicated > > group of people working individually or in small teams on tackling the > > problems involved in creating and maintaining an effective QA process > > for PHP. Some people do this - they take on one or more aspects of QA > > and devote time to it regularly. I feel that others like the idea of > > being part of the QA team, but rarely respond when the call goes out > > for help, feedback or testing. > > That is the nature of the beast. Just be happy it's not like hanging > flyers for a music gig where about 1,000 flyers turns into 1 attendee. :-) Point taken. At least we actually do QA on RCs now! :) [snip - lots of good advice - snip] > At *least* reading the list and either responding or losing your > "bitching rights" [not that I thought anybody was bitching in the > first place!] sounds like a very reasonable requirement to me. +1 > And certainly for inclusion in phpinfo() under PHP|QA. Inclusion > elsewhere in phpinfo() is really not within the pervue of this forum, > IMHO. Ah yes... [blush] let me go and get my smaller britches. ; ) --zak