Re: Re: [RFC] Better benchmarks for PHP

From: Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 01:30:59 +0000
Subject: Re: Re: [RFC] Better benchmarks for PHP
References: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7  Groups: php.qa 
Request: Send a blank email to php-qa+get-64684@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
I have done a line by line convertion of richards.js from the V8 google test but i am having some issues with inheritance in it. http://cznp.com/php/benchmark/ If someone can take a look at it, since i am still figuring out what exactly the code is doing, but meanwhile i did a convertion of one SunSpider test, the nsieve.js one. Its in the same folder and it can be added if you guys want. I am going to look at more SunSpider tests while trying to fix the richards test. Thanks, Ólafur Waage olafurw@gmail.com On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 10:07 PM, Nuno Lopes <nlopess@php.net> wrote: > I think that can be viewed as part of the project. Compiling a (little) > list of interesting applications is a challenging task. > For example, we can tweak say phpbb 3 to have it deployed automatically and > then use some real world data to build a set of requests that you want to > perform and benchmark. I actually run a phpbb forum with a little more than > 1 million visitors/month, so I can provide this data. > > You can also think about e.g. mediawiki. it should be easy to automatize, > and we could then ask for stats from the wikipedia guys. > > Nuno > > > ----- Original Message ----- > Since we are talking about benchmarking real world applications, do we have > a list of applications we wish to run the benchmarks on? > > On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 5:02 PM, Paul Biggar <paul.biggar@gmail.com> > wrote: > > On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 4:39 PM, Ólafur Waage <olafurw@gmail.com> wrote: >> > I have not delved deep into the tests that are referenced in the rfc but >> do >> > they include comparison data? >> >> Most have very little. Typically, they are built into the benchmark. >> I've updated the wiki page with everything I know about the data sets. >> >> >> Paul >> >> > >> > Thanks, >> > Olafur >> > >> > On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 4:05 PM, Pierre Joye <pierre.php@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> > >> >> hi, >> >> >> >> On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 8:18 AM, Sebastian Bergmann >> >> <sb@sebastian-bergmann.de> wrote: >> >> > Nuno Lopes schrieb: >> >> >> Comments, criticisms and volunteers especially welcome, >> >> > >> >> > When you do this, think about splitting each benchmark into a >> separate >> >> > file and have it run by a separate PHP process, see [1]. >> >> >> >> To split them into separate files/cases is definitively a good thing. >> >> >> >> I'm not sure we should run them in parallel. As it makes sense for the >> >> phpt, it may have counter effects for benchmark tests. Concurrent >> >> executions of a given feature/extension could help (for apc and stat >> >> cache for example), but maybe not for every part of php, or not by >> >> default. >> >> >> >> Cheers, >> >> -- >> >> Pierre >> >> >> >> http://blog.thepimp.net | >> >> http://www.libgd.org >> >> >> >> -- >> >> PHP Quality Assurance Mailing List >> >> <http://www.php.net/> >> >> To unsubscribe, visit: >> >> http://www.php.net/unsub.php >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> -- >> Paul Biggar >> paul.biggar@gmail.com >> > >

« previous php.qa (#64684) next »