Re: Re: [RFC] Better benchmarks for PHP
| From: | Ólafur Waage | Date: | Thu, 19 Feb 2009 01:30:59 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Re: [RFC] Better benchmarks for PHP | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 | Groups: | php.qa |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-qa+get-64684@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
I have done a line by line convertion of richards.js from the V8 google test
but i am having some issues with inheritance in it.
http://cznp.com/php/benchmark/
If someone can take a look at it, since i am still figuring out what exactly
the code is doing, but meanwhile i did a convertion of one SunSpider test,
the nsieve.js one. Its in the same folder and it can be added if you guys
want.
I am going to look at more SunSpider tests while trying to fix the richards
test.
Thanks,
Ólafur Waage
olafurw@gmail.com
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 10:07 PM, Nuno Lopes <nlopess@php.net> wrote:
> I think that can be viewed as part of the project. Compiling a (little)
> list of interesting applications is a challenging task.
> For example, we can tweak say phpbb 3 to have it deployed automatically and
> then use some real world data to build a set of requests that you want to
> perform and benchmark. I actually run a phpbb forum with a little more than
> 1 million visitors/month, so I can provide this data.
>
> You can also think about e.g. mediawiki. it should be easy to automatize,
> and we could then ask for stats from the wikipedia guys.
>
> Nuno
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> Since we are talking about benchmarking real world applications, do we have
> a list of applications we wish to run the benchmarks on?
>
> On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 5:02 PM, Paul Biggar <paul.biggar@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 4:39 PM, Ólafur Waage <olafurw@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > I have not delved deep into the tests that are referenced in the rfc but
>> do
>> > they include comparison data?
>>
>> Most have very little. Typically, they are built into the benchmark.
>> I've updated the wiki page with everything I know about the data sets.
>>
>>
>> Paul
>>
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > Olafur
>> >
>> > On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 4:05 PM, Pierre Joye <pierre.php@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> >> hi,
>> >>
>> >> On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 8:18 AM, Sebastian Bergmann
>> >> <sb@sebastian-bergmann.de> wrote:
>> >> > Nuno Lopes schrieb:
>> >> >> Comments, criticisms and volunteers especially welcome,
>> >> >
>> >> > When you do this, think about splitting each benchmark into a
>> separate
>> >> > file and have it run by a separate PHP process, see [1].
>> >>
>> >> To split them into separate files/cases is definitively a good thing.
>> >>
>> >> I'm not sure we should run them in parallel. As it makes sense for the
>> >> phpt, it may have counter effects for benchmark tests. Concurrent
>> >> executions of a given feature/extension could help (for apc and stat
>> >> cache for example), but maybe not for every part of php, or not by
>> >> default.
>> >>
>> >> Cheers,
>> >> --
>> >> Pierre
>> >>
>> >> http://blog.thepimp.net |
>> >> http://www.libgd.org
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> PHP Quality Assurance Mailing List
>> >> <http://www.php.net/>
>> >> To unsubscribe, visit:
>> >> http://www.php.net/unsub.php
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Paul Biggar
>> paul.biggar@gmail.com
>>
>
>