Re: Concerns over handling of bug #49105
| From: | Hannes Magnusson | Date: | Fri, 31 Jul 2009 10:05:53 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Concerns over handling of bug #49105 | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 | Groups: | php.qa |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-qa+get-65268@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 23:33, Alexander Trauzzi<atrauzzi@gmail.com> wrote:
> The assumption that there is no benefit is not really truthful. If another
> language like Java saw fit to implement this (I didn't know it did!), then
> there obviously is merit. There's some pretty good advantages when it comes
Just because PHP implemented safe_mode and magic_quotes, I don't think
any other language will consider it cool and implement it too.
> Given that you're trying to rationalize the "bogusing" of this bug, maybe I
> can put forward another idea. I understand the legacy concern, I truly do.
Can you imagine what would happen if every single bogus bug got the
same treatment as this one?
This is how PHP works and it will not change.
If you want additional features then request and write access to the
/rfc/ namespace on the wiki and write an RFC.
If you want to increase the chances of that feature making it in
a) attach a patch
b) find a dev thats interested in the RFC and bribe him to create a patch
-Hannes