Re: svn: /php/php-benchmarks/trunk/ benchweb/config.php benchweb/deploy.php benchweb/functions.php
benchweb/installers/phpbb/bench/LoremIpsum.class.php benchweb/installers/phpbb/bench/Post.php benchweb/installers/phpbb/bench/Record.php bench
| From: | Hannes Magnusson | Date: | Sat, 15 Aug 2009 12:40:38 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: svn: /php/php-benchmarks/trunk/ benchweb/config.php benchweb/deploy.php benchweb/functions.php benchweb/installers/phpbb/bench/LoremIpsum.class.php benchweb/installers/phpbb/bench/Post.php benchweb/installers/phpbb/bench/Record.php bench |
||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 | Groups: | php.qa |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-qa+get-65301@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 23:27, Paul Biggar<paul.biggar@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Pierre,
>
> On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 9:58 PM, Pierre Joye<pierre.php@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Yes, and we are trying to have a discussion about changing that for
>>> benchmarks, since the original reasons for the GPL ban are not
>>> relevant here.
>>
>> That won't happen. The ban is relevant here. Please remove this code
>> and try an alternative solution.
>
> If you could explain how the ban is relevant, I would agree. I have
> not seen such an explanation so far, only claims that "we've had this
> conversation before". I believe we haven't had this conversation
> before, only one that looks superficially similar. (If there has been
> this conversation before, I apologize, but I could not find it).
You would probably have to go waaay back in the archives.
We intentionally try to avoid this discussion, and I quite frankly do
not understand why you insist on having it.
Have you seen http://uk3.php.net/license/contrib-guidelines-code.php
yet?
You are arguing that you found a workaround for being able to use GPL
code in BSDish licensed code? And php-benchmarks shouldn't need to
follow any rules set by the PHP project?
Lets not go down that route please. We do not want GPL code in our
SVN, no matter how smart workarounds you have found to execute it.
I should not have to fear licensing issues in code I checkout (and
maybe change? use? hack it?) from php.net.
Be it unwritten rule, or archived somewhere, we simply do not want GPL.
-Hannes