RE: [SMARTY-DEV] Is Smarty using PHP output buffering?

There is a disadvantage, it was just mentioned. Those using mod_gzip on the Apache level see a performance degrade because the output gets buffered twice. In my tests I see a very slight performance degrade when using OB in combination with mod_gzip. Is suppose a property could be added $use_output_buffering that forced OB on a display() call, but the same can be accomplished with echo fetch(), or turn on OB in php.ini to get the benefits across the board. Monte On Tue, 2003-05-06 at 16:05, luis wrote: > I can't understand how OB falls outside te scope of Smarty "except of > fetch". > If fetch uses OB and is faster than display and there're no bad > side-effects then display should use OB too. > If we discover some disadvantages in using OB I'll inmediately retreat > the proposal just don't say "it's outside the scope of smarty" improving > is never outside the scope of Smarty. > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Tom Anderson [mailto:toma@etree.org] > > Sent: Tuesday, May 06, 2003 5:47 PM > > To: smarty-dev@lists.php.net > > Subject: RE: [SMARTY-DEV] Is Smarty using PHP output buffering? > > > > > > I really think global output buffering for smarty is a bad > > idea. For instance, it would slow down a server which has > > mod_gzip installed. Doing buffering in php and in apache, as > > mod_gzip would, is just using more memory than needed. > > > > I don't think turning on/off output buffering through a > > smarty function is right either. Except in the case of > > fetch(), output buffering falls outside the scope of Smarty. > > > > Tom > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: luis [mailto:luis@fuegolabs.com] > > Sent: Tuesday, May 06, 2003 2:38 PM > > To: 'Thomas Schulz'; smarty-dev@lists.php.net > > Subject: RE: [SMARTY-DEV] Is Smarty using PHP output buffering? > > > > > > I disagree. If OB is faster then Smarty should use OB > > transparently to the user/developer. It's not fair to ask a > > developer to fetch when there's a display method based on > > performance issues. The two methods should do the same > > internally, the semantic difference is whether the method > > outputs the content or not. > > > > --- > > Luis Argerich ( ) ASCII Ribbon Campaign > > http://tikiwiki.sourceforge.net X against HTML on > > email > > "There's no spoon" / \ and Usenet posts > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Thomas Schulz [mailto:ths@4bconsult.de] > > > Sent: Tuesday, May 06, 2003 5:23 PM > > > To: smarty-dev@lists.php.net > > > Subject: RE: [SMARTY-DEV] Is Smarty using PHP output buffering? > > > > > > > > > Monte Ohrt schrieb in php.smarty.dev: > > > > > > > I just ran a test on our CMS front page, gzip enabled, no caching. > > > > > > > > display() --> 1.724 secs/page > > > > echo fetch() --> 1.751 secs/page > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > I think gzip does some output buffering... > > > > > > When I render the main template of my application, that > > includes some > > > other templates and plugins (which fetch other templates) I get > > > these results: > > > > > > display() --> 0.65 secs/page > > > echo fetch() --> 0.38 secs/page > > > > > > But I think there is nothing to change in Smarty. If a > > programmer want > > > to have full control over output-buffering, he can use fetch()... > > > > > > Thomas. > > > > > > -- > > > http://4bconsult.de > > > > > > -- > > > Smarty Development Mailing List (http://smarty.php.net/) > > > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > > > > > > > > > -- > > Smarty Development Mailing List (http://smarty.php.net/) > > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > > > > > > -- > > Smarty Development Mailing List (http://smarty.php.net/) > > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > > -- Monte Ohrt <monte@ispi.net>