Re: Can we use PHPT instead of .php and .php.expect

From: Date: Sun, 04 Jan 2015 20:16:37 +0000
Subject: Re: Can we use PHPT instead of .php and .php.expect
References: 1 2 3 4 5 6  Groups: php.standards 
Request: Send a blank email to standards-+get-681@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
On Sun, Jan 4, 2015 at 8:49 PM, Sara Golemon <pollita@php.net> wrote: > On Sun, Jan 4, 2015 at 8:22 AM, Nikita Popov <nikita.ppv@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 2:11 AM, Stas Malyshev <smalyshev@sugarcrm.com> > > wrote: > > The phpt/ folder is not being kept updated. Anybody object to dropping it > > from the repo? It's trivial to generate it using ./make_phpt > > > > Alternatively drop the original files and only use phpt. Probably better > > because we have stuff like SKIPIF (for 32bit vs 64bit). > > > It's trivial to generate one into the other in either direction, so I > don't care much which we declare as the source. > > I'm partial to .phpt, myself... > > -Sara > If we start using .phpt exclusively, I'd also like to bundle run-tests.php and set up Travis to run PHP 5.6 and HHVM against the PHP-5.6 branch. Having these tests is kinda pointless if they fail and nobody even notices. Sadly we can't do the same for PHP 7 yet, because it isn't available on Travis. Nikita

« previous php.standards (#681) next »