Re: [PHP3] Re: [PHP Template] Re: [PHP3] PHP Template Engine spec revision 0.52
| From: | Cliff Rowley | Date: | Tue, 21 Mar 2000 18:32:37 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: [PHP3] Re: [PHP Template] Re: [PHP3] PHP Template Engine spec revision 0.52 | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.template |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-template+get-355@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Yup yup, I'm completely with you, good stuff. There have been situations
where I have handed over sites to clients who wish to maintain it after
I've finished with it. More often than not they've returned to me after
realising they've jumped in a little out of their depth. While this is
not a bad thing for my wallet, it's not good for my workload. Being able
to hand them off to a template engine would be a great asset in this
situation.
I would use it myself too, since I build my sites from templates. You
know, the whole idea sorta reminds me of sgml in a funny sorta way ;)
As far as saying "PHP already does what we need..." is not an
argument. Adding a template engine bears no effect on those who choose
not to use it.
Cliff Rowley
- while (!asleep) { code(); }