Re: [PHP3] Re: [PHP Template] Re: [PHP3] PHP Template Engine spec revision 0.52
| From: | Andrei Zmievski | Date: | Tue, 21 Mar 2000 20:00:43 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: [PHP3] Re: [PHP Template] Re: [PHP3] PHP Template Engine spec revision 0.52 | ||
| References: | 1 2 | Groups: | php.template |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-template+get-381@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Tue, 21 Mar 2000, John Coggeshall wrote:
> Of course not... but the thing is -- I'm NOT the one making that
> decision... I deal with people that have absolutely NO back-end technical
> experise what-so-ever... they don't understand PHP, they don't care about
> PHP... they want a look -- nothign more... so it really doesn't matter
> what's optional or not... or what I can or can not use -- I know what
> the best tool for the job is... my designer counterparts do not and
> therefore anything that they can do that complicates my job and makes my
> product less stable is NOT something I would agree with.
Perhaps, I'm missing something, but how would designers complicate your
job if all they do is use {CONTENT} here and there (and they would need
to know the names}? It's exactly the same thing you're doing with your
system right now.
-Andrei
* 2 + 2 = 5 for extremely large values of 2. *