Re: [PHP4BETA] <?=
| From: | Zeev Suraski | Date: | Fri, 11 Jun 1999 14:17:32 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: [PHP4BETA] <?= | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.version4 |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-version4+get-1490@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
I don't particularly like the idea of adding this as a tag. Why can't it
be a function?
Zeev
On Fri, 11 Jun 1999, Sascha Schumann wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 11, 1999 at 01:45:36PM +0300, Zeev Suraski wrote:
> >
> > Anybody against adding this operator to PHP's short tag mode? (equivalent
> > to ASP's <%=).
>
> While you're adding short tags - what about adding another one
> for easier session id propagation? If we don't provide this
> functionality in the core, people will probably start adding user
> code and do it themselves in many incompatible ways.
>
> I just visited a site (www.conrad.de, "Europe's largest
> specialist dealers in electronic products") which still feels the
> need to educate people on their use of cookies. I've been
> involved with such projects myself and know the trouble to push
> people to turn on cookies. Many people are simply too "plain" to
> understand what a cookie is in technical terms. They are stupid
> enough to rely on the media to provide them with "expert
> information." (yes, partial flame. I've to deal with users from
> time to time...)
>
> What worries me even more is that AltaVista has ~6500 entries for
> +danger +cookie*
>
> So, back to the technical part. We could do it the PHPLIB way,
> e.g.
>
> <??<url>??>
>
> and rewrite the <url> to include the session id, if necessary. Or
> even more simpler
>
> <???>
>
> which would be substituted with "session_name=session_id".
>
> --
>
> Regards,
>
> Sascha Schumann
> Consultant
>
--
-----------------------------------------------------
Zeev Suraski <zeev@zend.com>
For a PGP public key, finger bourbon@netvision.net.il