Re: Re: simple xml api

On Fri, 2003-01-31 at 05:51, Christian Stocker wrote: > On Thu, 2003-01-30 at 22:12, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote: > > I like the ideas around here a lot... I'm don't know too much about C, so > > unfortunately I won't be able to help out to much with coding the new > > extension, but I'd like to provide some feedback and help writing > > documentation (got doc-karma anyway...). One thing is that I'd hope the new > > extension would be called xml as opposite to domxml. Especially if it's > > going to be an extension comprising all the different stuff. > > yeah, domxml is not the right name anymore. but ext/xml is taken > already. maybe ext/libxml2 as it's based on this library, but I don't > like it that much, eiter :) Personally, I think we might get away with renaming deprecating the old ext/xml. At least if we plan to bundle libxml, there is no point in having two default extensions. -Sterling -- "Reductionists like to take things apart. The rest of us are just trying to get it together." - Larry Wall, Programming Perl, 3rd Edition