Re: php extension for libxl

From: Date: Sat, 28 Aug 2010 13:40:08 +0000
Subject: Re: php extension for libxl
References: 1 2 3 4 5 6  Groups: php.pecl.dev 
Request: Send a blank email to pecl-dev+get-7534@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
On Sat, 2010-08-28 at 15:21 +0200, Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote: > > The extension should be BSD/PHP licenses. For the libraries being used > > no such policy had ever been discussed. > > > though we should probably try to make this as visible as possible. > maybe even have a flag in the installer to prevent installing > libraries which require a commercial license for being allowed to use > the extension. We don't provide libraries. We document (hopefully) dependencies. If a user fetches a library he has to agree to the license (independent from the license being BSD, some commercial EULA, LGPL or whatever). I don't mind tagging "OSI approved OpenSource" or such but there is no policy preventing linking commercial libs. (If there is strong support for such a policy this might change, but there wasn't, and if this is changed, what I won't support, there should be a proper decision about handling "legacy" extensions) johannes

« previous php.pecl.dev (#7534) next »