Re: php extension for libxl

2010/8/28 Johannes Schlüter <johannes@php.net>: > On Sat, 2010-08-28 at 15:29 +0200, Pierre Joye wrote: >> >> > The extension should be BSD/PHP licenses. For the libraries being used >> >> > no such policy had ever been discussed. >> >> >> >> Wrong, we discussed the libs as well, obviously... >> > >> > Please point me to the discussion. >> >> Please read the archives. > > I couldn't find the discussion regarding a decision which prevents usage > of commercial libs. So please point me to it. Anyway, for one I'm against any new commercial only additions to pecl, for the libraries used by the extension. There are many reasons behind that: - pear installer tools allow companies to create their own channels - providing resources for commercial entities doing nothing or providing nothing for us - no matter how we say it, people will keep asking us to get support Cheers, -- Pierre @pierrejoye | http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org