Re: 4.0.2 RC1 php.exe performance

Hi Andi, > Are you using require() a lot? I think in big scripts that did lots of > require()'s the old "fast" method ended up being substantially slower. This > could explain the performance difference. > Yes, we are using require()'s instead of includes, for reasons you know of. Was there a change with the require in 4.0.2? > Also in case you were doing lots and lots of eval()'s there was also a > related memory leak patch which could have also effected your servers > performance. Yes, we use eval() a lot also, not lots and lots, but enough :) Thanks :) Brad Atkins > > Is it possibly one of these two? > > Andi > > At 07:13 PM 8/26/00 +0300, Zeev Suraski wrote: > >There's no script you can post that gives you much better performance > >under 4.0.2 than it did under 4.0.1? > > > >I can think about just one change we've made that can improve performance, > >but otherwise, I can't think of anything that would come even close to > >making such a significant performance increase. > > > >Zeev > > > >On Sat, 26 Aug 2000, Brad Atkins wrote: > > > > > Hi Zeev, > > > > > > > You mean Zak worked on performance? Zak? :) > > > > > > Sorry, it was waldschrott that said it was a duplicate bug and being worked > > > on: > > > > > > http://bugs.php.net/bugs.php?id=5921 > > > > > > > > > > > Something along the lines of 1000% improvement has to be a result of a > > > > major improvement in the scripting engine, and I don't recall making any > > > > revolutionary changes in Zend. > > > > What kind of script did you test? Can you post a couple of benchmarks > > > > with their results under 4.0.1 and 4.0.2RC1? > > > > > > Stas and Nettie have an idea of what I'm testing. A quick method of showing > > > improved performance is now I've lowered the max_execution_time to 30 back > > > from 60. I had to have it at 60 because 4.0.1 took so long. Now the scripts > > > execute under the alloted time. > > > > > > Something was fixed. I'm not sure, but it's working much better. The > > > environment hasn't changed. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Brad Atkins > > > > > > > > > > > Zeev > > > > > > > > On Sat, 26 Aug 2000, Brad Atkins wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hey, it doesn't make much sense, but it's much better :) > > > > > > > > > > I didn't notice any fixes going through it, although I heard that I > > > think > > > > > Zak was working on it. > > > > > > > > > > But it's fixed. Dunno about ISAPI yet though. > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > Brad Atkins > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Wow. That doesn't make much sense :) > > > > > > > > > > > > Zeev > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sat, 26 Aug 2000, Brad Atkins wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > I just compiled 4.0.2 RC1 as CGI and the performance has been > > > GREATLY > > > > > improved on the Windows platform. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Scripts now execute in 90% less time. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Excellent work! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Brad Atkins > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > Zeev Suraski <zeev@zend.com> > > > > > > http://www.zend.com/ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > PHP Development Mailing List > > > > > > <http://www.php.net/> > > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: php-dev-unsubscribe@lists.php.net > > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: php-dev-help@lists.php.net > > > > > > To contact the list administrators, e-mail: > > > php-list-admin@lists.php.net > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Zeev Suraski <zeev@zend.com> > > > > http://www.zend.com/ > > > > > > >-- > >Zeev Suraski <zeev@zend.com> > >http://www.zend.com/ > > > > > >-- > >PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/> > >To unsubscribe, e-mail: php-dev-unsubscribe@lists.php.net > >For additional commands, e-mail: php-dev-help@lists.php.net > >To contact the list administrators, e-mail: php-list-admin@lists.php.net > > --- > Andi Gutmans <andi@zend.com> > http://www.zend.com/