Re: XSLT extension

Stefan Livieratos wrote: > Hi Andi, > > those XSLT extensions are mostly wrappers for the corresponding > C++ libraries, as I understand it, so I can't see how one could > merge them into one super extension. You could of course try and > build an abstraction layer but I don't think this is feasible. It would be nice if the two extensions have an API that looks somewhat similar. But, if this is not possible, we could try to use the best parts of both library's in one extension. If one of the library's is not found during ./configure, the functions of that library are not enabled then. > > > So, if we were to make a decision which library/implementation to > use for PHP right now, I would say it is too early to decide. Sablotron > for example isn't 100% conformant to the XSLT spec and I am not > sure how stable Xalan-C++ is. I totaly agree with you. Sablotron is not 100% conformant (and has some flaws), and Xalan-C++ is in alpha stage too. Regards, -- Derick Rethans JDI Media Solutions H.v.Tussenbroekstraat 1 6952 BL Dieren The Netherlands e-mail: d.rethans@jdimedia.nl http://www.jdimedia.nl/