Re: convention about function naming
| From: | Jani Taskinen | Date: | Sun, 17 Dec 2000 17:57:10 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: convention about function naming | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-dev+get-41676@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Sun, 17 Dec 2000, André Langhorst wrote:
>> I was just thinking the same..:)
>> Just add socket_ or sock_ prefix to them?
>> Having some function called shutdown() is not very good thing (tm) :)
>>
>> And as this extension is useless (does not compile) e.g. on Solaris
>> this would be good time to rename them..this is experimental extension
>> still, isn't it? (in EXTENSIONS status is Unknown)
>
>In addition, I have no clue where to get the socket.h to compile it on
>Win32, but it seems to be prepared for Win32, is it not?
No it's not. At least there isn't any .dsp file in ext/sockets/
--Jani