Re: short_open_tag
| From: | Andrei Zmievski | Date: | Thu, 17 Oct 2002 16:37:36 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: short_open_tag | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 | Groups: | php.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-dev+get-89668@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
They are _not_ the same person!
On Thu, 17 Oct 2002, Zeev Suraski wrote:
> Well, I differ with you on that. I don't think there's anything in the
> same class as <?xml.
>
> Zeev
>
> At 18:08 17/10/2002, Andi Gutmans wrote:
> >I don't think we should add special hacks to the scanner. Soon we're going
> >to have a zillion hacks for other XML/SGML/foobar documents.
> >
> >Andi
> >
> >At 12:17 PM 10/16/2002 -0400, Ilia A. wrote:
> >>Since the general consensus by the developers is not to remove the
> >>short_tags
> >>or even disable them. Perhaps we should consider alternate solutions to
> >>this
> >>problem. Given the buzzword popularity of XML and its slowly growing
> >>popularity among website designers (XHTML) this issue is likely to come
> >>up in
> >>the future yet again.
> >>The solution I would like to offer, is a patch that adds special handling
> >>for
> >><?xml. Thus preventing the language parser from attempting to parse data
> >>inside <?xml as PHP source.
> >>
> >>Ilia
>
>
> --
> PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/>
> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
-Andrei http://www.gravitonic.com/
"Claiming Java is easier than C++ is like
saying that K2 is shorter than Everest."
-- Larry O'Brien (editor, Software Development)