Re: short_open_tag
| From: | Maxim Maletsky | Date: | Tue, 22 Oct 2002 11:48:04 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: short_open_tag | ||
| References: | 1 2 | Groups: | php.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-dev+get-89915@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
no
--
Maxim Maletsky
maxim@php.net
www.PHPBeginner.com // where PHP Begins
Daniel Lorch <daniel@lorch.cc> wrote... :
> hi,
>
> > >If the big question between to have or not to have short_open_tags is to
> > >impact on stability, then removing the option will cirtainly eliminate
> > >that instability in the future. Moving from an earlier version to version
> > >5 is the perfect opportunity to instigate such a change since most scripts
> > >will need to be ported anyway.
> > >I cirtainly do not advocate any changes to the exisitng version of PHP.
> > >Lets be clear that it's version 5 that we're discussing.
> >
> > agreed, if this changes, version 5 at least.
>
> Uhm, let me throw in a little question, please. If we're going to change PHP5
> fundamentally to PHP4, do we go back to adding the version number to the file
> extension, e.g. *.php5 ? I'm just thinking from a mass hoster's point of view,
> who certainly is interested in supporting PHP5, but does not want to give up
> customers depending on how PHP4 used to work.
>
> -daniel
>
> --
> PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/>
> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
>