Re: A complete summary of doc.keliglia.com status

Arnaud Limbourg wrote:

* RFC: From my experience, when an RFC (Request For Comments) is published, the only way to provide comments is to answer with an mail. Some comments get lost in the archives.. Sometimes the RFC slowly dies without bringing anything. I've sent an RFCs for this website 6 or 7 months ago, for the user notes system a year ago.. nothing was done until today, and I'm not sure to be able to provide all the comments that I've collected since then. I asked Yannick to make a simple RFC reader/comment system on the website. It's a basic stuff, and it's online, waiting for your comments. Maybe we can create an RFC dir in each documentation repository to discuss the particular topics (restructuring the install part for phpdoc, using phpdocumentor for peardoc, ..), and an RFC dir in the website CVS module to discuss some global issues (how do we document a class ? I know Steph has been waiting for an official and global answer since ... too much time).

As a note you might want to have a look at PePr, it's the system PEAR uses to manage package proposals and RFCs. It's in pearweb cvs module, you can see it in action at http://pear.php.net/pepr/pepr-overview.php

I just had the time to take a deep look at pepr and it's really what we need for the RFC system :) We'll use it if nobody objects. Mehdi PS: joli blog ;)