Re: Re: Zend encoding and security
| From: | Manuel Lemos | Date: | Wed, 11 Jun 2003 10:59:04 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Re: Zend encoding and security | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 | Groups: | php.general |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-general+get-151043@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Hello,
On 06/11/2003 06:08 AM, Zeev Suraski wrote:
At 16:27 09/05/2003, Manuel Lemos wrote:Have you been on vacation or just working really hard to beat Turck? :-)
I guess they can't compare with what they can't afford to buy. Anyway, it does not seem to make much sense to compare code acceleration based on plain caching/optimization like Turck and Zend Cache do, with acceleration plus content caching and compressing like ZPS do, because in that case you probably want to consider a solution of: Turck for code acceleration http://www.turcksoft.com/en/e_mmc.htm mod_gzip for content compressions http://i4net.tv/marticle/mod_gzip/ And one of many dynamic content caching solutions like this one: http://www.phpclasses.org/filecacheclass -- Regards, Manuel Lemos Free ready to use OOP components written in PHP http://www.phpclasses.org/Except they only compare it to the entry-level product from Zend (ZPS Accelerator Edition). The Zend Performance Suite Enterprise Edition outperforms any alternative by a wide margin, typically by a factor of 10 to 100 times better performance.I've been using the Turck MM Cache for 3 months now and the performance is amazing :)Yes, their benchmarks show that it pratically matches Zend products performance, thus beating all the others.