Re: in_array() 4.0.0 -> 4.0.2

> The functionality of in_array has changed between 4.0.0 -> 4.0.2 > > The difference is that in x.2 in_array() moves the internal array > pointer to the found item; and in x.0 it dose not. > > Can anyone tell me why the change was made? And is the x.0 > version a bug or is the x.2 version a bug? Hrm. I remember asking Andrei to change this. Although not exactly this. What I didn't like was that if an element wasn't found in the array, the array pointer ended up at the end of the array. He fixed that, but I didn't realize that this also changed the nature of a match. The question is whether or not in_array() should affect the array pointer at all. I am not sure it should. -Rasmus