Re: in_array() 4.0.0 -> 4.0.2
| From: | jeremy brand | Date: | Tue, 12 Sep 2000 16:04:01 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: in_array() 4.0.0 -> 4.0.2 | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.general |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-general+get-16379@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
> > I think that the default behavoiur should not alter the internal pointer.
> > I agree that the name in_array does not imply any ``other'' effects. So
> > ``other'' effects should be optional. What do you think?
>
> I would agree with that.
>
> <sigh> Who knows what the fifth option might be in the future...
This whole thing could get out of hand. Maybe the optional argument
should be a bit field.
-jeremy brand
_______________________________________________________________________
GnuPG Fingerprint: 9F5E 95E0 1CC2 E054 84EA 6099 8ACD 9DBA D2C0 5EA9
_ http://www.JeremyBrand.com/Jeremy/Brand/Jeremy_Brand.html
for more __