Re: in_array() 4.0.0 -> 4.0.2
| From: | Andrei Zmievski | Date: | Tue, 12 Sep 2000 15:59:42 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: in_array() 4.0.0 -> 4.0.2 | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 | Groups: | php.general |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-general+get-16377@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Tue, 12 Sep 2000, David Newcomb wrote:
> A fourth option would be nice.
> I am happy to follow the general consensus, whatever it may be.
>
> Andrei also wrote:
> > You just have to ask yourself
> > if that's what you really want and whether array pointer movement should
> > be on by default or not.
>
> I think that the default behavoiur should not alter the internal pointer.
> I agree that the name in_array does not imply any ``other'' effects. So
> ``other'' effects should be optional. What do you think?
I would agree with that.
<sigh> Who knows what the fifth option might be in the future...
-Andrei
Linux is like living in a teepee.
No Windows, no Gates, Apache in house.
- Usenet signature