Re: Re: php framework vs just php?
| From: | Tony Marston | Date: | Tue, 22 Apr 2008 15:31:51 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Re: php framework vs just php? | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 | Groups: | php.general |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-general+get-273427@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
""Daniel Brown"" <parasane@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:ab5568160804220824u70842b22ke50cded4cbb13cdf@mail.gmail.com...
> On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 11:18 AM, Tony Marston
> <tony@marston-home.demon.co.uk> wrote:
> [snip!]
>>
>> The real measure of a good framework is the length of time it takes to
>> create a new database table, then write the components to maintain the
>> contents of that table. I can do this in 5 minutes without having to
>> write a
>> single line of PHP, HTML or SQL. If you can't match this then you're not
>> in
>> the same league.
>
> I had never heard this before. Silly me.... I thought the "real
> measure of a good framework" was how much of the monotony of coding
> was removed, how many problems solved, et cetera.
>
> So I guess the BASh script I just whipped up a few seconds ago
> could be classified as a good framework. Since it's less than 40
> lines, and doesn't require me to write any PHP, HTML, or SQL, I meet
> the requirements.
Unless you are creating a PHP component which uses HTML forms to allow the
user to communicate with a relational database then no, it does not qualify.
--
Tony Marston
http://www.tonymarston.net
http://www.radicore.org
> Once again, it's semantics. Everyone is saying the same thing,
> just not using the same terminology.
>
> --
> </Daniel P. Brown>
> Dedicated Servers - Intel 2.4GHz w/2TB bandwidth/mo. starting at just
> $59.99/mo. with no contract!
> Dedicated servers, VPS, and hosting from $2.50/mo.