Re: Re: php framework vs just php?
| From: | Robert Cummings | Date: | Wed, 23 Apr 2008 22:15:23 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Re: php framework vs just php? | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 | Groups: | php.general |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-general+get-273507@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Wed, 2008-04-23 at 16:50 -0500, Shawn McKenzie wrote:
> Robert Cummings wrote:
> > On Tue, 2008-04-22 at 19:05 -0500, Shawn McKenzie wrote:
> >> Tony Marston wrote:
> >>> ""Jay Blanchard"" <jblanchard@pocket.com> wrote in
> >>> message
> >>>
> >>> news:9F6B7518E92167499E0168D01C2D8D9C41755B@YGEX01WAL.onecall.local...
> >>> [snip]
> >>>>> You haven't answered the question. Where can this piece of wizardry
> >>>>> be
> >>>>> downloaded so that it can be reviewed by your peers?
> >>> [/snip]
> >>>
> >>>> It is not available for download
> >>> So your claims cannot be substantiated by anyone in this group.
> >>>
> >>>> but it has been reviewed by peers on
> >>>> several project teams who have used it. It was developed specifically
> >>>> for a company who owns the work product. I have not re-created for
> >>>> general use by mere mortals but I will soon.
> >>> Let me know when as I could do with a good laugh.
> >>>
> >> Well, if you would take the time to individually download > 1,000
> >> classes and piece them together you may find a very feature rich
> >> framework: http://www.phpclasses.org. Or maybe meta
> >> storage
> >> http://www.meta-language.net/metastorage.html.
> >
> > Or you may find you've got >999 classes of code you'll never use :) That
> > would be one hell of an undertaking to piece them together. I'm going to
> > guess you'll need namespaces too since I bet some of them step on each
> > other's toes.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Rob.
>
> Obviously not a very good one, but that was in the spirit of a joke. ;-)
I took it that way :)
Cheers,
Rob.
--
http://www.interjinn.com
Application and Templating Framework for PHP